Mycophenolate in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with mycophenolate. Methods: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases through June 2022 for studies using mycophenolate to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Results: The literature review resulted in seven studies fitting the inclusion criteria. The systematic review and meta-analyses revealed changes in forced vital capacity % predicted (mean difference [MD], 5.4%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 3.3%, 7.5%), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted (MD, 4.64%; 95% CI: 0.54%, 8.74%), and breathlessness score (MD, 1.99; 95% CI: 0.36, 3.62) favored mycophenolate over placebo. The risk of anemia (relative risk [RR], 2.3; 95% CI: 1.2, 71.4) was higher with mycophenolate. There were no significant differences between mycophenolate and cyclophosphamide, except risk of premature discontinuation (RR, 0.6; 95% CI: 0.4, 0.9), and leukopenia (RR, 0.1; 95% CI: 0.05, 0.4) favored mycophenolate. The quality of evidence was moderate to very low per GRADE. Conclusions: Mycophenolate use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with statistically significant improvements in disease progression and quality-of-life measures compared with placebo. There were no differences in mortality, disease progression, or quality of life compared with cyclophosphamide, but there were fewer adverse events. The quality of evidence is very low.

Cyclophosphamide in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with cyclophosphamide. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through June 2022 for studies using cyclophosphamide to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Five studies were included; two randomized controlled trials compared cyclophosphamide versus placebo, and one randomized controlled trial and two retrospective case-control studies compared cyclophosphamide versus mycophenolate. Compared with placebo, there was a 2.83% reduction in the decline at 12 months for forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted using cyclophosphamide (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-4.87; low evidence). There were improvements in breathlessness (Transition Dyspnea Index mean difference [MD], 2.90; 95% CI, 1.94-3.86; minimum clinically important difference, 1; moderate evidence) and disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index MD, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.04; minimum clinically important difference, -0.14; moderate evidence). There were increased risks of leukopenia and constitutional symptoms using cyclophosphamide, but no difference in mortality. When cyclophosphamide was compared with mycophenolate, there were differences in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide % predicted favoring mycophenolate at 6 months (MD, -3.67%; 95% CI, -6.3% to -1.1% unadjusted; MD, -4.88%; 95% CI, -7.3% to -2.5% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), 12 months (MD, -5.90%; 95% CI, -8.4% to -3.4% adjusted for alveolar volume; moderate evidence), and 18 months (MD, -3.26%; 95% CI, -6.1% to -0.4%; moderate evidence), but not at 24 months. There were no differences in FVC % predicted, mortality, or quality-of-life outcomes, but participants were more likely to prematurely discontinue cyclophosphamide compared with mycophenolate (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.10-2.63; high-certainty evidence). Conclusions: A review of the published evidence shows that cyclophosphamide is effective in SSc-ILD compared with placebo, with an increased risk of side effects. However, mycophenolate may be equivocal or better than cyclophosphamide. Clinicians and patients should weigh the potential benefits and risks with respect to individual patient circumstances and preferences.

Treatment of Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Evidence-based Recommendations. An Official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To date, clinical practice guidelines regarding treatment for patients with SSc-ILD are primarily consensus based. Methods: An international expert guideline committee composed of 24 individuals with expertise in rheumatology, SSc, pulmonology, ILD, or methodology, and with personal experience with SSc-ILD, discussed systematic reviews of the published evidence assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Predetermined conflict-of-interest management strategies were applied, and recommendations were made for or against specific treatment interventions exclusively by the nonconflicted panelists. The confidence in effect estimates, importance of outcomes studied, balance of desirable and undesirable consequences of treatment, cost, feasibility, acceptability of the intervention, and implications for health equity were all considered in making the recommendations. This was in accordance with the American Thoracic Society guideline development process, which is in compliance with the Institute of Medicine standards for trustworthy guidelines. Results: For treatment of patients with SSc-ILD, the committee: 1) recommends the use of mycophenolate; 2) recommends further research into the safety and efficacy of (a) pirfenidone and (b) the combination of pirfenidone plus mycophenolate; and 3) suggests the use of (a) cyclophosphamide, (b) rituximab, (c) tocilizumab, (d) nintedanib, and (e) the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Conclusions: The recommendations herein provide an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the treatment of patients with SSc-ILD and are intended to serve as the basis for informed and shared decision making by clinicians and patients.

Rituximab in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with rituximab. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases through June 2022 for studies using rituximab to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Disease progression, quality of life, mortality, and adverse event data were extracted. The intervention was rituximab. The standard-of-care comparator group was decided a priori by consensus of the panel as either placebo or mycophenolate. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Three relevant studies were selected. Rituximab significantly improved the forced vital capacity % predicted (mean difference, 3.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37 to 5.90) and the modified Rodnan Skin Score (mean difference, -7.01; 95% CI, 11.46 to -2.56) at 24-48 weeks. Conclusions: Rituximab use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with stabilization of lung function. The quality of evidence for study outcomes was considered to be very low, as defined by the GRADE approach. Additional research on treatment with rituximab is imperative.

Nintedanib Therapy Alone and Combined with Mycophenolate in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society convened an international multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine whether patients with SSc-ILD should be treated with nintedanib alone or with the combination of nintedanib plus mycophenolate. Data Sources: Literature searches were conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases through June 2022 for studies using nintedanib or nintedanib plus mycophenolate to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, quality of life, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: For nintedanib therapy alone, the systematic review included three total studies and revealed that disease progression was less in the nintedanib arm (the annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity [FVC] was 44.5 ml less, the absolute change from baseline was 46.4 ml less, and FVC% predicted was 1.2% less in the nintedanib arm) compared with placebo. However, gastrointestinal side effects and treatment discontinuation were double in the nintedanib arm compared with placebo. For combination therapy, the systematic review also included three total studies and revealed that changes in the annual rate of decline in FVC favored combination therapy over placebo (mean difference, 79.1 ml). Combination therapy was, however, associated with increased gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with placebo. The quality of evidence for all outcomes was very low as per GRADE. Conclusions: The use of nintedanib alone and in combination with mycophenolate in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with a significant reduction in disease progression compared with placebo but at the cost of increased gastrointestinal side effects and treatment discontinuation. The quality of evidence is very low.

Tocilizumab in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society (ATS) convened an international, multidisciplinary panel to develop clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review and evaluate the literature to determine the impact of treating patients with SSc-ILD with tocilizumab on prespecified critical and important outcomes determined by the ATS guideline panel. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through June 2022 for studies using tocilizumab to treat patients with SSc-ILD. Data Extraction: Mortality and disease progression were determined to be critical outcomes of focus, with quality of life and adverse events important outcomes. Data on these outcomes were extracted and meta-analyses performed using the generic inverse variance method when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group method was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: The literature review resulted in five studies for inclusion. The absolute decrease from baseline in forced vital capacity (FVC) for the tocilizumab arm was 118 ml, 241 ml, and 129 ml less than the placebo arm at 24, 48, and 96 weeks, respectively, favoring tocilizumab. The mean decrease in FVC% predicted at 48 weeks was 6.50% less and the risk of decrease >10% was 66% less in the tocilizumab arm, whereas patients were 1.97 times more likely to have any increase in FVC% predicted if they received tocilizumab in place of placebo. When the placebo arm was given tocilizumab from 48 to 96 weeks, the mean change in absolute FVC was 54.90 ml less and the mean change in FVC% predicted was 1.30% less. For diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DlCO)% predicted, at 48 weeks there was 1.50% less change and from 48 to 96 weeks there was 5.40% less change in the tocilizumab arm. Quantitative Interstitial Lung Disease scores and Quantitative Lung Fibrosis scores at 48 weeks and modified Rodnan skin scores at 72 weeks all favored the tocilizumab arm, as did several adverse event parameters, including serious adverse events (mean difference, -27.40; 95% confidence interval, -30.10 to -24.70). The quality of evidence was very low grade. Conclusions: Tocilizumab use in patients with SSc-ILD is associated with less disease progression and a better toxicity profile than placebo. However, the quality of evidence is very low, and large prospective studies dedicated to assessing tocilizumab specifically for SSc-ILD are needed.

The American Thoracic Society Guideline Methodology Training Program.

A new era in guideline creation began in 2011 with publication of the Institute of Medicine (now the National Academy of Medicine) Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines. The American Thoracic Society (ATS) was committed to developing guidelines in accordance with the new standards and decided that an experienced guideline methodologist would be required on ATS guideline projects to ensure correct implementation of the standards. The ATS Guideline Methodology Training Program was launched to increase the pool of trained methodologists. Each year, accepted trainees (methodology scholars) attend a workshop that introduces them to the terminology and process of guideline development and are given the option of participating in a guideline project. Scholars work with the mentorship of a lead methodologist to conduct and then present a systematic review to the guideline committee, discuss the evidence, and participate in the development of evidence-based graded recommendations. Scholars have participated in 22 ATS guidelines over the past 9 years, and most remain engaged in guideline development. For the past 2 years, the methodological aspects of all ATS guideline projects were led by graduates of the training program, and several scholars have accepted positions to lead guidelines for other professional societies. Guideline methodology is particularly suitable for clinician educators because the work is clinically oriented, and guidelines confer high academic capital. Those who elect not to continue in guideline development still acquire the skills to perform and publish systematic reviews, as well as to educate trainees in reading and reviewing literature.

Pirfenidone in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax convened to update clinical practice guidelines for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate existing ILD literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic pirfenidone. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using pirfenidone to treat patients with PPF. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, lung function, and adverse event data were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Two studies met inclusion criteria. Meta-analyses revealed that changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) percent predicted (mean difference [MD], 2.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-4.1%), the FVC in milliliters (MD, 100.0 ml; 95% CI, 98.1-101.9 ml), and the 6-minute-walk distance in meters (MD, 25.2 m; 95% CI, 8.3-42.1 m) all favored pirfenidone over placebo. The changes in the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) in millimoles per kilopascal per minute (MD, 0.40 mmol/kPa/min; 95%, CI 0.10-0.70 mmol/kPa/min) and risk of DLCO declining more than 15% (relative risk [RR], 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08-0.95) also favored pirfenidone. The risks of gastrointestinal discomfort (RR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.29-2.60) and photosensitivity (RR, 4.88; 95% CI, 1.09-21.83) were higher with pirfenidone. The quality of the evidence was low or very low according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation criteria, depending on the outcome. Conclusions: Pirfenidone use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression and with protection of lung function. However, there is very low certainty in the estimated effects because of limitations in the available evidence. Primary Source of Funding: Funded by the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.

Nintedanib in Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax convened to update clinical practice guidelines for interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objective: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate existing ILD literature to determine whether patients with progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) should be treated with the antifibrotic nintedanib. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted across MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases through December 2020 for studies using nintedanib to treat patients with PPF. Data Extraction: Mortality, disease progression, and adverse event data were extracted, and meta-analyses performed when possible. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group approach was used to assess the quality of evidence. Synthesis: Two relevant studies were selected. The annual decline in forced vital capacity was less in the nintedanib arm in the overall study population (mean difference [MD], 107 ml/yr; 95% confidence interval [CI], 65.4 to 148.5 ml/yr) and in the subgroups with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 128.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 70.8 to 185.6 ml/yr), non-UIP patterns of pulmonary fibrosis (MD, 75.3 ml/yr; 95% CI, 15.5 to 135.0 ml/yr), fibrotic connective tissue disease-related ILD (MD, 106.2 ml/yr; 95% CI, 10.6 to 201.9 ml/yr), fibrotic idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (MD, 141.7 ml/yr; 95% CI, 46.0 to 237.4 ml/yr), and fibrotic occupational ILD (MD, 252.8 ml/yr; 95% CI, 79.2 to 426.5 ml/yr), but not fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (MD, 72.9 ml/yr; 95% CI, -8.9 to 154.7 ml/yr), fibrotic sarcoidosis (MD, -20.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, -337.1 to 296.1 ml/yr), or unclassified fibrotic ILD (MD, 68.5 ml/yr; 95% CI, -31.3 to 168.4 ml/yr) when compared with placebo. Gastrointestinal side effects were common. Quality of evidence for the outcomes ranged from very low to moderate GRADE. Conclusions: Nintedanib use in patients with PPF is associated with a statistically significant decrease in disease progression but increase in gastrointestinal side effects regardless of the radiographic pattern of pulmonary fibrosis. However, limitations in the available evidence lead to low certainty in these effect estimates and make definitive conclusions about the differential effects by subtype of ILD difficult to determine. Primary Source of Funding: Funded by the American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax.

Transbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review.

Rationale: In 2018, a systematic review evaluating transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) was performed to inform American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax clinical practice guidelines on the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Objectives: To perform a new systematic review to inform updated guidelines. Methods: Medline, Excerpta Medica Database, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CCTR) were searched through June 2020. Studies that enrolled patients with ILD and reported the diagnostic yield or complication rates of TBLC were selected for inclusion. Data was extracted and then pooled across studies via meta-analysis. The quality of the evidence was appraised using the grading of recommendations, assessment, development, and evaluation approach. Results: Histopathologic diagnostic yield (number of procedures that yielded a histopathologic diagnosis divided by the total number of procedures performed) of TBLC was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76-83%) in patients with ILD. TBLC was complicated by bleeding and pneumothorax in 30% (95% CI, 20-41%) and 8% (95% CI, 6-11%) of patients, respectively. Procedure-related mortality, severe bleeding, prolonged air leak, acute exacerbation, respiratory failure, and respiratory infection were rare. The quality of the evidence was very low owing to the uncontrolled study designs, lack of consecutive enrollment, and inconsistent results. Conclusions: Very low-quality evidence indicated that TBLC has a diagnostic yield of approximately 80% in patients with ILD, with manageable complications.

Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (an Update) and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Adults: An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline.

Background: This American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana de Tórax guideline updates prior idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) guidelines and addresses the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) other than IPF. Methods: A committee was composed of multidisciplinary experts in ILD, methodologists, and patient representatives. 1) Update of IPF: Radiological and histopathological criteria for IPF were updated by consensus. Questions about transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, genomic classifier testing, antacid medication, and antireflux surgery were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. 2) Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): PPF was defined, and then radiological and physiological criteria for PPF were determined by consensus. Questions about pirfenidone and nintedanib were informed by systematic reviews and answered with evidence-based recommendations using the GRADE approach. Results:1) Update of IPF: A conditional recommendation was made to regard transbronchial lung cryobiopsy as an acceptable alternative to surgical lung biopsy in centers with appropriate expertise. No recommendation was made for or against genomic classifier testing. Conditional recommendations were made against antacid medication and antireflux surgery for the treatment of IPF. 2) PPF: PPF was defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation in a patient with an ILD other than IPF. A conditional recommendation was made for nintedanib, and additional research into pirfenidone was recommended. Conclusions: The conditional recommendations in this guideline are intended to provide the basis for rational, informed decisions by clinicians.

Antacid Medication and Antireflux Surgery in Patients with Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Rationale: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a fibrosing interstitial pneumonia with impaired survival. Previous guidelines recommend antacid medication to improve respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF. Objectives: This systematic review was undertaken during the development of an American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax guideline. The clinical question was, "Should patients with IPF who have documented abnormal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) with or without symptoms of GER disease 1) be treated with antacid medication or 2) undergo antireflux surgery to improve respiratory outcomes?" Methods: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the gray literature were searched through June 30, 2020. Studies that enrolled patients with IPF and 1) compared antacid medication to placebo or no medication or 2) compared antireflux surgery to no surgery were selected. Meta-analyses were performed when possible. Outcomes included disease progression, mortality, exacerbations, hospitalizations, lung function, respiratory symptoms, GER severity, and adverse effects/complications. Results: For antacid medication, when two studies were aggregated, there was no statistically significant effect on disease progression, defined as a 10% or more decline in FVC, more than 50-m decline in 6-minute walking distance, or death (risk ratio [RR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-1.03). A separate study that could not be included in the meta-analysis found no statistically significant effect on disease progression when defined as a 5% or more decline in FVC or death (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00-1.21) and an increase in disease progression when defined as a 10% or more decline in FVC or death (RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.51). For antireflux surgery, there was also no statistically significant effect on disease progression (RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.06-1.26). Neither antacid medications nor antireflux surgery was associated with improvements in the other outcomes. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to conclude that antacid medication or antireflux surgery improves respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF, most of whom had not had abnormal GER confirmed. Well-designed and adequately powered prospective studies with objective evaluation for GER are critical to elucidate the role of antacid medication and antireflux surgery for respiratory outcomes in patients with IPF.

Antimicrobial Stewardship in the ICU.

Increasing rates of infection and multidrug-resistant pathogens, along with a high use of antimicrobial therapy, make the intensive care unit (ICU) an ideal setting for implementing and supporting antimicrobial stewardship efforts. Overuse of antimicrobial agents is common in the ICU, as practitioners are challenged daily with achieving early, appropriate empiric antimicrobial therapy to improve patient outcomes. While early antimicrobial stewardship programs focused on the financial implications of antimicrobial overuse, current goals of stewardship programs align closely with those of critical care providers-to optimize patient outcomes, reduce development of resistance, and minimize adverse outcomes associated with antibiotic overuse and misuse such as acute kidney injury and Clostridioides difficile-associated disease. Significant opportunities exist in the ICU for critical care clinicians to support stewardship practices at the bedside, including thoughtful and restrained initiation of antimicrobial therapy, use of biomarkers in addition to rapid diagnostics, Staphylococcus aureus screening, and traditional microbiologic culture and susceptibilities to guide antibiotic de-escalation, and use of the shortest duration of therapy that is clinically appropriate. Integration of critical care practitioners into the initiatives of antimicrobial stewardship programs is key to their success. This review summarizes key components of antimicrobial stewardship programs and mechanisms for critical care practitioners to share the responsibility for antimicrobial stewardship.

Use of a Genomic Classifier in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) is the histopathologic hallmark of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), the prototypical interstitial lung disease (ILD). Diagnosis of IPF requires that a typical UIP pattern be identified by using high-resolution chest computed tomography or lung sampling. A genomic classifier for UIP has been developed to predict histopathologic UIP by using lung samples obtained through bronchoscopy. Objective: To perform a systematic review to evaluate genomic classifier testing in the detection of histopathologic UIP to inform new American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax guidelines. Data Sources: Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through June 2020. Data Extraction: Data were extracted from studies that enrolled patients with ILD and reported the use of genomic classifier testing. Synthesis: Data were aggregated across studies via meta-analysis. The quality of the evidence was appraised by using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. Results: Genomic classifier testing had a sensitivity of 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55-73%) and a specificity of 92% (95% CI, 81-95%) in predicting the UIP pattern in ILD. Confidence in an IPF diagnosis increased from 43% to 93% in one cohort and from 59% to 89% in another cohort. Agreement levels in categorical IPF and non-IPF diagnoses measured by using a concordance coefficient were 0.75 and 0.64 in the two cohorts. The quality of evidence was moderate for test characteristics and very low for both confidence and agreement. Conclusions: Genomic classifier testing predicts histopathologic UIP in patients with ILD with a specificity of 92% and improves diagnostic confidence; however, sensitivity is only 68%, and testing is not widely available.

Cancer Is an Independent Risk Factor for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Critically Ill Patients: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a frequent cause of respiratory failure in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and results in significant morbidity and mortality. ARDS often develops as a result of a local or systemic inflammatory insult. Cancer can lead to systemic inflammation but whether cancer is an independent risk factor for developing ARDS is unknown. We hypothesized that critically ill cancer patients admitted to the ICU were at increased risk for the diagnosis of ARDS. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of critically ill patients admitted between July 2017 and December 2018 at an academic medical center in Columbus, Ohio. The primary outcome was the association of patients with malignancy and the diagnosis of ARDS in a multivariable logistic regression model with covariables selected a priori informed through the construction of a directed acyclic graph. RESULTS: 412 ARDS cases were identified with 166 of those patients having active cancer. There was an association between cancer and ARDS, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.55 (95% CI 1.26-1.92, P < 0.001). When adjusted for our pre-specified confounding variables, the association remained statistically significant (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.15-2.13, P = 0.004). In an unadjusted pre-specified subgroup analysis, hematologic malignancy (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.30-2.53, P < 0.001) was associated with increased odds of developing ARDS while non-metastatic solid tumors (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.31-0.85, P = 0.01) had statistically significant negative association. Cancer patients with ARDS had a significantly higher ICU (70.5% vs 39.8%, P < 0.001) and hospital (72.9% vs 40.7%, P < 0.001) mortality compared to ARDS patients without active malignancy. CONCLUSION: In this single center retrospective cohort study, cancer was found to be an independent risk factor for the diagnosis of ARDS in critically ill patients. To our knowledge, we are the first report an independent association between cancer and ARDS in critically ill patients.